Sharpen your emergency nursing prep with a fresh CEN practice question, updated daily.
Mr. Harrison, a 71-year-old patient, presents to a Level I trauma center complaining of unilateral left calf pain and swelling that started two days ago. He has a history of atrial fibrillation, well-controlled on metoprolol, and recently underwent knee arthroscopy three weeks prior. On examination, his left calf is edematous, warm to touch, and tender with vital signs stable: BP 130/85, HR 78, RR 16, SpO2 98% on room air, Temp 98.6°F (37°C).
A venous duplex ultrasound confirms a deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the left popliteal vein. The emergency physician initiates oral rivaroxaban and plans for discharge with close outpatient follow-up.
As the emergency nurse providing discharge instructions to Mr. Harrison and his family, which of the following safety instructions is the most critical to emphasize?
The most critical safety instruction for a patient being discharged with a newly diagnosed deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is education regarding the signs and symptoms of a pulmonary embolism (PE). A PE is a potentially fatal complication of DVT, occurring when a clot dislodges and travels to the lungs. Sudden shortness of breath, acute chest pain, and hemoptysis are hallmark symptoms requiring immediate emergency medical attention, as timely intervention can be life-saving.
While strict adherence to anticoagulation, monitoring for bleeding, and using compression stockings with leg elevation are all crucial components of DVT management and secondary prevention, they do not address the immediate, life-threatening acute complication of the DVT itself to the same degree as recognizing signs of PE. The risk of PE is highest in the acute phase following DVT diagnosis, making this safety instruction paramount for discharge education in the emergency setting.
The emergency department receives a transfer from an urgent care clinic with a working diagnosis of severe gastroenteritis and dehydration. The 71-year-old patient presents with a blood pressure of 88/52 mmHg, heart rate of 118 bpm, respiratory rate of 22 bpm, SpO2 of 94% on room air, and a temperature of 97.2°F (36.2°C). Point-of-care glucose is 62 mg/dL.
Family reports a 3-day history of progressive weakness, nausea, vomiting, and diffuse abdominal pain. The patient has a known history of Addison's disease, typically managed with daily hydrocortisone, but has been unable to keep oral medications down for the past 24 hours. On assessment, the patient is lethargic but arousable to verbal stimuli. Skin is cool, clammy, and pale with decreased skin turgor. Peripheral pulses are weak and thready, and the cardiac monitor displays sinus tachycardia.
Considering these findings, what is the most appropriate initial nursing priority at triage for this patient?
The patient presents with classic signs and symptoms of an adrenal crisis, including hypotension, tachycardia, hypoglycemia, hypothermia (relative to age/illness), gastrointestinal distress, and lethargy, compounded by a history of Addison's disease and inability to take prescribed hydrocortisone. The immediate priority in an adrenal crisis is to address the circulatory shock and the underlying hormonal deficiency. Rapid intravenous fluid resuscitation with normal saline is critical to correct hypovolemia and hypotension, while immediate administration of intravenous glucocorticoids (e.g., hydrocortisone) is life-saving to replace the missing cortisol.
While obtaining a 12-lead ECG and laboratory tests (including cortisol) are crucial for diagnosis and ongoing management, they should not delay the initial emergent stabilization of the patient's hemodynamic status. Administering dextrose only addresses the symptom of hypoglycemia, not the underlying cause of the crisis or the overall shock state. Initiating cardiac monitoring and oxygen are important supportive measures, but they are secondary to the immediate need for fluid resuscitation and glucocorticoid replacement to reverse the life-threatening circulatory collapse and hormonal imbalance. Therefore, establishing IV access, initiating fluids, and preparing for steroid administration constitute the most time-critical initial nursing priority.
Emergency Medical Services (EMS) has just arrived with a 24-year-old male who was pulled from a residential pool approximately 90 minutes prior to arrival after being found unresponsive by friends. Bystanders initiated chest compressions and rescue breaths for an estimated 2 minutes before the patient regained consciousness and began coughing. Paramedics report a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 15, patent airway, and stable vital signs en route to the emergency department.
Upon initial assessment in the ED, the patient is cooperative and oriented to person, place, and time. Current vital signs are: BP 128/76 mmHg, HR 88 bpm, RR 16 breaths/min, SpO2 99% on room air, Temp 98.4°F (36.9°C). Lung sounds are clear bilaterally with no accessory muscle use. A portable chest X-ray shows no acute infiltrates, and arterial blood gas analysis is within normal limits. The emergency physician has determined the patient is medically stable for discharge, pending comprehensive discharge instructions.
As the emergency nurse preparing for discharge, what is the *most critical* instruction to provide to the patient and his family to ensure continued safety?
Even in seemingly stable patients following a near-drowning event, there is a significant risk of delayed pulmonary complications, most notably secondary drowning due to delayed pulmonary edema or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Aspiration of even small amounts of fluid can lead to alveolar damage, surfactant washout, and increased capillary permeability, resulting in fluid shifts into the interstitial and alveolar spaces that may manifest hours after the initial event. This can lead to rapid and severe respiratory compromise.
Therefore, continuous vigilant monitoring for any changes in respiratory status, such as new or worsening cough, dyspnea, tachypnea, or increased work of breathing, is the most critical instruction. These symptoms warrant immediate return to the emergency department for re-evaluation and potential intervention, as delayed pulmonary complications can be life-threatening. While other instructions like follow-up care, activity restrictions, and monitoring for infection are important, they do not address the immediate, acute, and potentially rapid deterioration from delayed pulmonary edema, making respiratory monitoring the highest priority for discharge teaching in this context.
The Emergency Department is experiencing a surge in pediatric respiratory presentations following a community-wide allergen exposure event, straining available resources. Three infants have just arrived via EMS, all with varying degrees of respiratory distress. You are tasked with rapidly triaging and initiating care for these patients, applying mass casualty principles.
Paramedics provide report on a 6-month-old infant, "Baby L," whose parents report a 2-day history of progressive cough and rhinorrhea, escalating to severe work of breathing over the past 4 hours. En route, the infant received one nebulized albuterol treatment with no improvement. Upon ED arrival, the infant is lethargic, with a weak, muffled cry. Vital signs include heart rate 180 beats/min, respiratory rate 70 breaths/min, blood pressure 80/45 mmHg, temperature 38.2°C (rectal), and SpO2 86% on a 10 L non-rebreather mask. Physical assessment reveals significant intercostal and subcostal retractions, marked nasal flaring, expiratory wheezing, inspiratory grunting, and peripheral pulses are diminished with a capillary refill time greater than 4 seconds.
Based on these findings and mass casualty triage principles, what is the priority action for Baby L?
This 6-month-old infant presents with severe respiratory distress, lethargy, significant retractions, grunting, tachypnea, tachycardia, hypotension, and profound hypoxemia despite high-flow oxygen. Diminished peripheral pulses and capillary refill greater than 4 seconds indicate poor perfusion and compensated shock. These findings are consistent with impending respiratory failure and circulatory compromise, placing the infant in a critical, time-sensitive state.
According to JumpSTART pediatric mass casualty triage guidelines (or similar principles), an infant with an altered mental status, absent/weak peripheral pulses, and respirations requiring ventilatory assistance, or SpO2 < 90% despite oxygen, would be categorized as "Immediate" (Red). The priority action in a mass casualty scenario for an "Immediate" patient is to rapidly allocate resources for life-saving interventions, specifically definitive airway management (such as intubation preparedness) to address respiratory failure and immediate fluid resuscitation to address the signs of shock, to ensure hemodynamic stability and optimize oxygenation and ventilation. The other options represent incorrect triage classifications or delayed, insufficient interventions for such a critically ill infant.
A 30-week gestation pregnant patient self-presents to a rural emergency department during a night shift with limited staffing, reporting progressive dyspnea, fatigue, and atypical chest discomfort for the past 24 hours. Her vital signs are: BP 82/50 mmHg, HR 128 bpm, RR 28 breaths/min, SpO2 90% on room air, Temp 98.6°F (37°C). On assessment, you note significant jugular venous distension, muffled heart sounds (though difficult to discern clearly over fetal heart tones), and cool, clammy extremities. Initial interventions include supplemental oxygen via non-rebreather, establishing two large-bore IVs, and administering a 500 mL bolus of crystalloid, which results in a transient BP increase to 90/60 mmHg but rapid return to previous hypotensive readings.
The ED physician performs a point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), which clearly reveals a large pericardial effusion with evidence of right ventricular diastolic collapse. The facility does not have on-site cardiothoracic surgery or advanced cardiac interventional capabilities.
Considering the patient's critical condition, the limited resources, and the need for definitive care, which of the following represents the safest and most appropriate nursing disposition and discharge planning action?
Cardiac tamponade is a life-threatening emergency requiring immediate intervention to relieve pressure on the heart. The patient's presentation with hypotension, tachycardia, jugular venous distension (Beck's triad), and evidence of right ventricular collapse on POCUS confirms this diagnosis. In a rural ED with limited resources, definitive treatment such as pericardiocentesis or surgical intervention is not available. Delaying definitive treatment significantly increases maternal and fetal mortality risk.
Therefore, the safest and most appropriate action is immediate emergent transfer to a higher-level facility with the necessary capabilities (cardiothoracic surgery for pericardiocentesis/pericardial window and high-risk obstetrics for concomitant maternal-fetal care). The nurse's role in disposition planning includes preparing for such a transfer, ensuring hemodynamic stability during transport, and anticipating potential interventions en route. Administering additional fluids without definitive relief of the tamponade is a temporary measure that can exacerbate pulmonary congestion and does not address the underlying pathology. Focusing solely on obstetrics or delaying transfer until the morning is inappropriate and dangerous given the emergent cardiac condition.
Join emergency nurses receiving our daily CEN practice challenges and high-yield content.